US Support for Death Squads in Iraq — Some Evidence and a Chronology

As the headlines attest, death squad activity in Iraq is not only well-established but escalating. In recent months, hundreds have been killed in Baghdad alone while thousands are believed to have fallen victim throughout Iraq. In July this year, US forces in Baghdad began a well-publicized campaign against the death squads.

The prevailing, shall we say, “mainstream wisdom” about Iraqi death squads runs about as follows (from a July 25, 2006 CNN online report):

Most death squad killings appear to be sectarian, with Sunni Muslim gunmen targeting Shia neighborhoods, and Shiite attackers going after Sunnis. Victims are sometimes abducted by the dozens, their bodies often turning up later with signs of torture.

On Monday [July 24, 2006], three bodies were recovered across Baghdad. All had been shot in the head and showed signs of being brutalized.

Sunni leaders have accused Iraq’s Shiite-dominated government of allowing gunmen from Shiite militias to infiltrate Iraq’s police force, but U.S. troops have not found a “larger organization” behind the killings, Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said.

“It appears it’s very extremist elements from both sides out there operating, using murder and assassination as their means by which to further personal goals that they’re trying to achieve,” he said.

In July, about a month ago, the Pentagon launched a well-publicized counteroffensive against the death squads called, I shit you not, Operation Together Forward. As reported in the Washington Post recently:

The military calls the new battle for Baghdad “Operation Together Forward.” It began about two weeks ago [ca. mid-July 2006], with raids by U.S. and British special operations forces to capture or kill death squad leaders. So far, about 10 have been “taken out,” most of them members of the Mahdi Army, according to administration officials. The operations included a strike by British forces against a Mahdi Army lieutenant who had been terrorizing residents of Basra in southern Iraq.

But there’s a few stones in the proverbial shoe about the whole Iraqi death squad thing, namely a January 2005 Newsweek online article titled ‘The Salvador Option’: The Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination or kidnapping teams in Iraq. It never appeared in Newsweek‘s newsstand edition, but the story was picked up by a few international news services and reproduced en masse throughout the blogosphere and, of course, the “leftie net”, where it’s an open and ongoing subject of discussion.

Unspecified but plural “sources” and “officials” inside the Pentagon told Newsweek that consideration was in the advanced stages over employing death squad tactics in Iraq taken from the Salvadoran and other death squad operations run by CIA and the Pentagon during the 1980s. Hence the nickname, The Salvador Option. The conservative elements were said to be strongly in favor and were discussing specifics.

Historically, death squads are special units within the military, secretly directed usually by the internal security service or the interior ministry. All are trained by and ultimately answer to the US usually via CIA, Special Forces, embassy officials with a “special portfolio,” and/or other covert personnel. Senior controllers in Washington DC are generally well — but deniably — briefed on the operations, which are sanctioned (again, secretly) at the highest levels of the US Administration. There is extensive available literature providing ample documentation of the Latin American death squads.

(As an aside, it perhaps bears mentioning that there are in fact some 380 troops and “special forces” from El Salvador’s 4th Cuscatlan Batalion in Iraq, according to 2005 numbers. Not that Salvadorans are the only ones capable of teaching or running death squads. After all, we trained them.)

That article appeared in January 2005. As it happens, a steady upward curve of death squad violence began to appear almost immediately thereafter. By November, only 10 months later, Z Magazine ran an article by Nicolas JS Davies, “The Dirty War in Iraq”, which summarized news accounts of dozens of death squad and similar incidents in Iraq, all within the prior 11 or 12 months. In June 2005, an Iraqi special correspondent for Knight Ridder, Yasser Salihee, who was writing increasingly damaging articles about Iraqi death squads, was shot once through the head by a sniper and killed while stopped at a US/Iraqi-manned checkpoint newly erected near his home.
Recently, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (yes, the former presidential candidate) added a memo to the Congressional Record concerning a letter he sent to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. In the letter, dated April 5, 2006, Kucinich recites one of the most comprehensive checklists I’ve seen of Iraqi death squad related press revelations and related events within the US and Iraq militaries. He concludes by requesting “a copy of all records pertaining to Pentagon plans to use U.S. Special Forces to advise, support and train Iraqi assassination and kidnapping teams. I look forward to receiving your response.” I’m not sure of Rumsfeld’s response if any, but I can imagine.

I can’t vouch for everything in Kucinich’s letter to Rumsfeld, but what I do know jives with how he puts it. The letter makes a lengthy post, but I want it on hand and it’s posted without making endorsement or judgement of Kucinich per se (a discussion for another day). Over time I’ll try to add contextual links to the reports and sources cited.

Letter to Secretary Rumsfeld
Source: www.kucinich.us/floor_speeches/iq_rumsfeld_letter4may.php

Dennis Kucinich speaking from the Floor of the House – Extensions of Remarks
Congressional Record, May 4, 2006

“Mr. Speaker, [on April 5 2006] I sent the following letter to Secretary Rumsfeld requesting records pertaining to Pentagon plans to use U.S. Special Forces to advise, support, and train Iraqi death squads:”

Hon. Donald Rumsfeld,
Secretary of Defense,
The Pentagon, Washington, DC.

April 5, 2006

Dear Secretary Rumsfeld:

I am writing to request a copy of all records pertaining to Pentagon plans to use U.S. Special Forces to advise, support and train Iraqi assassination and kidnapping teams.

On January 8, 2005, Newsweek magazine first published a report that the Pentagon had a proposal to train elite Iraqi squads to quell the growing Sunni insurgency. The proposal has been called the “Salvador Option,” which references the U.S. military assistance program, initiated under the Carter Administration and subsequently pursued by the Reagan Administration, that funded and supported “nationalist” paramilitary forces who hunted down and assassinated rebel leaders and their supporters in El Salvador. This program in El Salvador was highly controversial and received much public backlash in the U.S., as tens of thousands of innocent civilians were assassinated and “disappeared,” including notable members of the Catholic Church, Archbishop Oscar Romero and the four American churchwomen. According to the Newsweek report, Pentagon conservatives wanted to resurrect the Salvadoran program in Iraq because they believed that despite the incredible cost in human lives and human rights, it was successful in eradicating guerrillas.

Mr. Secretary, at a news conference on January 11, 2005, you publicly stated that the idea of a Salvador option was “nonsense.” Yet mounting evidence suggests that the U.S. has in fact funded and trained Iraqi assassination and kidnapping teams and these teams are now operating with horrific success across Iraq.

We know that the Pentagon received funding for training Iraqi paramilitaries.

About one year before the Newsweek report on the “Salvador Option,” it was reported in the American Prospect magazine on January 1, 2004 ["Phoenix Rising" by Robert Dreyfuss, American Prospect vol. 15, no. 1] that part of $3 billion of the $87 billion Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill to fund operations in Iraq, signed into law on November 6, 2003, was designated for the creation of a paramilitary unit manned by militiamen associated with former Iraqi exile groups. According to the Prospect article, experts predicted that creation of this paramilitary unit would “lead to a wave of extrajudicial killings, not only of armed rebels but of nationalists, other opponents of the U.S. occupation and thousands of civilian Baathists.” The article further described how the bulk of the $3 billion program, disguised as an Air Force classified program, would be used to “support U.S. efforts to create a lethal, and revenge-minded Iraqi security force.” According to one of the article’s sources, John Pike, an expert of classified military budgets at www.globalsecurity.org, “the big money would be for standing up an Iraqi secret police to liquidate the resistance.”

We know that some of the Pentagon’s Iraq experts were involved in the Reagan Administration’s paramilitary program in El Salvador.

Colonel James Steele, Counselor to the U.S. Ambassador for Iraqi Security Forces, formerly led the U.S. Military Advisory Group in El Salvador from 1984-1986, where he developed special operating forces at brigade level during the height of the conflict. The role of these forces in El Salvador was to attack “insurgent” leadership, their supporters, sources of supply, and base camps. Currently Colonel Steele has been assigned to work with the new elite Iraqi counter-insurgency unit known as the Special Police Commandos, operating under Iraq’s Interior Ministry.

Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, was U.S. Ambassador to Iraq from June 2004 to April 2005. From 1981 to 1985, he was ambassador to Honduras where he played a key role in coordinating U.S. covert aid to the Contras, anti-Sandinista militias who targeted civilians in Nicaragua. Additionally, he oversaw the U.S. backing of a military death squad in Honduras, Battalion 3-16, which specialized in torture and assassination. The U.S. had similar programs of supporting paramilitary groups set up Nicaragua and Honduras as its program in El Salvador. In a Democracy Now interview on January 10, 2005, Allan Nairn, who broke the story about U.S. support of death squads in El Salvador, suspected that Ambassador Negroponte would most likely be involved in the economic side of U.S. support to death squads in Iraq.

We know that a wave of abductions and executions, in the style of the death squads of El Salvador, and with ties to an official government sponsor, and to the U.S., has hit Iraq.

News reports over the past 10 months strongly suggest that the U.S. has trained and supported highly organized Iraqi commando brigades, and that some of those brigades have operated as death squads, abducting and assassinating thousands of Iraqis. Some news highlights:

  • May 1, 2005 Los Angeles Times reports that the U.S. is providing technical and logistical support to the Maghawir (Fearless Warrior) brigades, the Interior Ministry’s special commandos, according to Major General Rasheed Flayih Mohammed. Iraqi authorities plan to increase deployment of the 12,000-strong Maghawir (Fearless Warrior) brigades, which are composed of well-trained veterans who have worked closely with U.S. forces in Najaf, Fallujah and Mosul and include the Wolf, Scorpion, Tiger and Thunder brigades.
  • May 16-20, 2005 — Los Angeles Times and New York Times reveal discovery of 46 bodies, all Iraqi men abducted and slain execution-style, in various locations: floating in the Tigris, dumped in ditches and garbage-strewn lots, and buried at a poultry farm.
  • June 15, 2005 Washington Post reports that U.S. forces had knowledge of secret and illegal abductions of hundreds of minority Arabs in Kirkuk. The abductions were by forces led by Kurdish political parties and backed by the U.S. military.
  • June 20, 2005 Los Angeles Times reports that Saad Sultan, of Iraq Human Rights Ministry said that police and security forces attached to the Iraqi Interior Ministry, thousands of whom have been trained by American instructors, are responsible for abusing up to 60% of estimated 12,000 detainees in prison and military compounds. He says the units have used tactics reminiscent of Saddam’s secret intelligence squads.
  • July 3, 2005 — Reuters News reports that the government of Iraq publicly acknowledged that the new security forces were using torture. Article further says that accounts are common of people being seized by armed men in the uniforms of the police, army or special units like Baghdad’s Wolf Brigade police commandos, and then disappearing without trace or being found dead.
  • July 28, 2005 Los Angeles Times reports that members of a California Army National Guard company, the Alpha Company, who were implicated in a detainee abuse scandal, trained and conducted joint operations with the Wolf Brigade, a commando unit criticized for human rights abuses. In an online Alpha Company newsletter, Captain Haviland wrote, “We have assigned 2nd Platoon to help them transition, and install some of our ‘Killer Company’ aggressive tactical spirit in them.” The article further states that despite the Wolf Brigade’s controversial reputation for human rights violations, it is regarded as the gold standard for Iraqi security forces by U.S. military officials.
  • August 31, 2005 — BBC reports that on the night of August 24, a large force of the Volcano Brigade raided homes in Al-Hurriyah city in the Baghdad, kidnapping and then executing 76 citizens. The victims were all shot in the head after their hands and feet had been tied up. They suffered the harshest forms of torture, deformation and burning.
  • November 16, 2005 — Reuters News reports the discovery of 173 malnourished men, some of whom were tortured, imprisoned in a secret jail run by Shi’ite militias tied to the Interior Ministry.
  • November 17, 2005 Newsday reports that in the past year, the U.S. military has helped build up Iraqi commandos under guidance from James Steele, a former Army Special Forces officer who led U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in El Salvador in the 1980s. The brigades built up over the past year include the Lion Brigade, Scorpion Brigade and Volcano Brigade.
  • February 15, 2006 — Associated Press reports that the Interior Ministry has launched a probe into death squad allegations.
  • February 19, 2006 — BBC reveals that morgues in Baghdad receive dozens of bodies picked up daily from rivers, sewage plants, waste burial sites, farms and desert areas. Most of the bodies are handcuffed and blindfolded civilians with a bullet or more in the forehead, indicating that they were executed. The handcuffs used on the victims are like those used by the Iraqi police.
  • February 26, 2006 — The Independent reports that outgoing United Nations’ human rights chief in Iraq, John Pace, revealed that hundreds of Iraqis are being tortured to death or summarily executed every month in Baghdad alone by the death squads working from the Ministry of Interior. He said that up to three-quarters of the corpses stacked in the Baghdad mortuary show evidence of gunshot wounds to the head or injuries caused by drill-bits or burning cigarettes.
  • March 9, 2006 — Los Angeles Times reports that Iraqi police officers who worked at the Interior Ministry’s illegal prison had received American training, and that U.S. trainers have also given extensive support to 27 brigades of heavily armed commandos accused of a series of abuses, including the death of 14 Sunni Arabs who were locked in an airtight van last summer.
  • March 10, 2006 — Sidney Morning Herald reports that men wearing the uniforms of U.S.-trained security forces, which are controlled by the Interior Ministry, abducted 50 people in a daylight raid on a security agency. Masked men who are driving what appear to be new government-owned vehicles are carrying out many of the raids.
  • March 27, 2006 — The Independent reports that while U.S. authorities have begun criticizing the Iraqi government over the “death squads,” many of the paramilitary groups accused of the abuse, such as the Wolf Brigade, the Scorpion Brigade and the Special Police Commandos were set up with the help of the American military. Furthermore, the militiamen were provided with U.S. advisers some of whom were veterans of Latin American counter-insurgency which also had led to allegations of death squads at the time.

Mr. Secretary, in light of this evidence of U.S. support for and the existence of death squads in Iraq, what is the basis for your January 11, 2005 statement, that the idea of a Salvador option in Iraq is “nonsense”?

I request a copy of all records pertaining to Pentagon plans to use U.S. Special Forces to advise, support and train Iraqi assassination and kidnapping teams. I look forward to receiving your response.

Sincerely,
Dennis J. Kucinich,
Member of Congress

Journal of National Security Law & Policy

The McGeorge School of Law at the University of the Pacific has launched a new quarterly, the Journal of National Security Law and Policy, now in its second issue. For now, at least, they’re posting all articles as PDFs for free download, so if’n you’re interested — and you should be — get on over there.

The journal focuses on “questions of war and terrorism, international relations, democracy, and civil liberties.” While peer-reviewed and faculty edited, its authorial base is broader than might be expected, reaching “across doctrinal lines by involving academics from disciplines other than law, as well as members of the military, intelligence, law enforcement, and civil liberties communities.”
The current issue includes papers from two symposia, one on “Fighting Terrorism with Torture: Where to Draw the Line?” and the second on “Lawyers’ Roles in the War on Terror.” Topics include Abu Ghraib (facetiously titled “‘Just for Fun’”), examinations of the CIA’s current role in torture and of the Military Commissions (“Should Lawyers Participate in Rigged Systems?”), and the ramifications of the notorious 2002 “torture memo” issued by the White House Office of Legal Counsel. See why you should be interested?

The legal aspects of the War on Terror ™ in general, the sweeping reinterpretations (cough) of law and treaty obligations staked out by the Bush Administration, the to-date compliant — nay, the treasonously collaborationist — attitude of Congress, the GOP’s highyl successful packing of the federal judiciary with ideological neanderthals, and the domestic and international implications of it all mean that the Journal of National Security Law & Policy — or at least its focus — is something to pay very close attention to.

And while such journals may sometimes make for dry reading, if you’ve got four neurons to rub together, can read at a freshman collegiate level, and have access to Google for the toughies and tangents you can easily understand this sort of fare.

Red Alert: CIA and NSA to Be Given ‘Warrentless Arrest’ Power

This really is gravely serious. Please act IMMEDIATELY: contact your Congressional Representative and tell them to oppose this terrifying and utterly irresponsible slide into a Gestapo state. Find/contact your Representative via http://www.house.gov/writerep/

The House version of the 2007 intelligence authorization bill — H.R. 5020 — would grant CIA and NSA security personnel the authority to make “warrantless arrests” for “any felony” committed in their presence, no matter how remote from the foreign intelligence mission it might be or where they occurred, the Baltimore Sun reported on April 25, 2006.

Section 432 of the bill grants similar authority to NSA security personnel.

For more info, see:

http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/04/house_poised_to_grant_arrest_p.html

and

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.spies25apr25,0,5928384.story

For the full bill –HR 5020 — see http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.5020:
(Relevant excerpts are also quoted below.)

This legislation would create what can only be characterized as a secret police force controlled directly by the President. This is precisely the American Gestapo that the Republicans themselves warned about when Truman first sought to create the CIA in 1945.

There are two (count ‘em) fig leaves in the legislation, both meaningless. First, the power of warrentless arrest would apply “only” to “personnel designated to carry out protective functions.” A literalist reading of this would equate to security personnel; in practice there is nothing to prevent the Director of Central Intelligence (Porter Goss, a partisan Republican warrior whose leadership had sharply divided the CIA) from “designating” every employee, agent, and asset of the CIA as having a “protective function.” Second (albeit not quoted below), the DCI’s and NSA director’s “policies” must be in line with “policies” promulgated by the Attorney General. But considering that our current Atty. Gen., Alberto Gonzales, signed on to the notion that no law or treaty or Constitutional provison in any way restricts the President from authorizing torture and, jeepers, unilateral secret detention of anyone anywhere, this is obviously a distinction without a difference.

Let us review the basic current situation:

* The President has claimed for himself the power to hold anyone, including any US citizen, in secret detention “exempt” from habeas corpus protection.

* The President claims the courts have no jurisdiction. After the Supreme Court challenged this, Congress recently passed a law (still untested in the courts) specifically declaring that the courts have no jurisdiction over such “detentions”.

* Ever-mounting evidence from multiple independent sources makes it undeniable that A) an unknown but presumably large number of persons have been abducted by US intelligence and military personnel, and B) an extensive “black” network of airplanes is secretly transporting these abductees to third countries for incarceration, interrogation, and torture (otherwise…why do it at all, and why fire CIA analysts for allegedly leaking the info)

* In January 2005, Newsweek reported senior Pentagon counterinsurgency planners were seriously considering what they referred to as “The Salvador Option” for Iraq — meaning creating and controlling death squads just as had been done throughout Latin America during the latter years of the Cold War. Less than a year later, the first press reports began to surface of death squad activity in Iraq, believed to be tied to the Iraqi Interior Ministry.

* The Bush Administration has made it abundantly clear that it makes little or no distinction between tactics and strategies that can/should be applied abroad vs. domestically.

* The “warrantless arrest” provision was inserted into the bill at the request of National Intelligence Director John D. Negroponte. As US Ambassador to Honduras during the 1980s, Negroponte helped facilitate and cover-up, you guessed it, death squad activities in Latin America.

* There have been numerous accurate reports in recent months of sweeping abuses of power in the “war on terror” directly targeting the homeland population.

Now the House wants to grant arrest powers to the CIA and the NSA??!?!?!

SPECIFIC LANGUAGE:

H.R.5020
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)

SEC. 423. ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS AND AUTHORITIES FOR PROTECTIVE PERSONNEL OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

[...snip...]

(b) Authority to Arrest-

(1) Chapter 203 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`Sec. 3065. Powers of authorized personnel in the Central Intelligence Agency

`(a) The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency may issue regulations to allow personnel designated to carry out protective functions for the Central Intelligence Agency under section 5(a)(4) of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 403f) to, while engaged in such protective functions, make arrests without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of such personnel, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States, if such personnel have probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing that felony offense.

[...snip...]

SEC. 432. CODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES OF NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY PROTECTIVE PERSONNEL.

[...snip...]

(b) Authority to Arrest-

(1) Chapter 203 of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 423 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`Sec. 3066. Powers of authorized personnel in the National Security Agency

`(a) The Director of the National Security Agency may issue regulations to allow personnel designated to carry out protective functions for the Agency to–

`(1) carry firearms; and

`(2) make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of such personnel, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States, if such personnel have probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing that felony offense.

[...end quote...]

Pentagon’s ‘Information Operations Roadmap’

The National Security Archives has managed to pry a (partially) declassified copy of the DOD’s Information Operations Roadmap (PDF, 2mb) from the maws of the government secrecy machine. As usual, they also offer an excellent analysis and selection of related documents. Also, the BBC offers a good summary news article for those preferring a more digestible version.

The document, promulgated in October 2003 when it was signed by Rummy hisself, has been cited in a number of recent news stories of late, but until has not been available to the general taxpaying public.

Why should you care? Well, for one “information operations” is a euphemism for “psychological warfare” which these days is leavened with a little cyber-warfare. In other words: propaganda, “military deception” ops, hacking, fending off hackers, and electronic warfare.

Yawn. Yeah, so? So…in this day and age, psy-ops directed at foreign audiences can simultaneously effect you, me, your grandma, and everybody else living here in Der Homeland. Aside from posing obvious problems when it comes to, say, forming knowledgeable opinions as a citizen about a war or, I dunno, secret detentions maybe, for the US government to target the US public with propaganda is a federal crime.

Concerns over such “blowback” (as it’s called in the trade) are not merely academic handwringing in view of numerous recent (and earlier) revelations of the Pentagon planting news stories around the world that did indeed get play here in the States, not to mention the fact that since a still-secret 1999 order by President Clinton “public diplomacy” (yet another propaganda euphemism) ops have beenexpanded to include all agencies of the government — a policy only amplified since GW and company came into power.

Council of Europe Report on US-Sponsored Secret ‘Detentions’ in Europe

Read the official full text of the Jan. 22, 2006 preliminary report by Council of Europe investigator Dick Marty, Alleged secret detentions in Council of Europe member states, which is also archived at Cryptome.

The “information memorandum” is part of an ongoing investigation that US-based Human Rights Watch is publicly calling on member European nations to cooperate with. (A worthwhile visit is HRW’s index of their recent work viz. Torture and Abuse.)

The report was released simultaneously with this article in New Statesman magazine (also covered in the Guardian (UK) newspaper) revealing a leaked British government memo formulating what the Guardian calls a “hidden strategy aimed at suppressing a debate about rendition” intended to “stifle attempts by MPs to find out what it knows about CIA ‘torture flights’” even as the Foreign Ministry “privately admits that people captured by British forces could have been sent illegally to interrogation centres.” The memo was written in response to a request from Prime Minister Blair’s office on advice on how to deal with the scandal and, in particular, mounting evidence that the British government was a knowing participant in the secret US program of “extraordinary rendition.” (Hanah Arendt on the role of euphemism in fascism, anyone?)

‘Course, those of us who remember the ’80s — and were paying any attention at all at the time — remember another euphemism: disappearances. I’m just sayin’.

The Walls Have Ears? Okay. HEY, FUCK YOU!!!

Cryptome has posted an 18-page excerpt from the brand-new book by James Risen, State of War: the Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. Risen is the NY Times reporter who broke the story about illegal domestic spying by the NSA that was (did I mention illegally?) “authorized” (um, though turns out maybe retroactively) by Prezdint Gee Duhbya. And yes, this is a big story.

Turns out that during the year the NY Times sat on the story, per agreement with worried Admin figures, he just did more leg work and wrote hisself and damned book. Take that, evildoers!

Cryptome, god love it, has also archived important but apparently wholly deleted documentary evidence and first-hand accounts of Uzbeki disappearance and torture chambers funded by Your Government And Mine (with some help from the Brits). The material originated from one Craig Murray, the former British Ambassador to the Central Asian Republic of Uzbekistan who quit, turned critic, and then went nuclear (so to speak) by releasing these and other documents that make it crystal clear everyone knew what they were doing while they did what they were doing. Huh…go figure. (There’s also a massive Google compile of Murray-related links.)

So…why was Clinton impeached exactly?? Oh yeah…lying about a blowjob. Right.